Terraform has become the go-to tool for managing infrastructure as code (IaC), enabling teams to define, provision, and manage cloud resources efficiently. One of the key components of Terraform is the state file, which keeps track of resources, dependencies, and metadata to ensure Terraform can apply changes correctly.
In a simple deployment, managing the state file is straightforward, but things get more complex when handling multiple environments (e.g., development, staging, production) or multiple projects. Without a well-defined strategy, teams may face challenges such as state conflicts, security risks, and accidental cross-environment changes.
This blog post explores different strategies for managing Terraform state files in multi-environment deployments. We'll cover various approaches, their pros and cons, and best practices to ensure security, stability, and efficiency. Additionally, we'll provide examples for storing Terraform state files in Google Cloud Storage (GCP) to help you implement a robust state management solution.
Let's dive in!
Terraform uses a state file (terraform.tfstate
) to keep track of the infrastructure it manages. This file
serves as a mapping between Terraform configurations and real-world resources, enabling Terraform to determine what
changes need to be applied.
The state file is important because:
By default, Terraform stores the state file locally, but in production environments, it is best practice to store it in a remote backend to enable collaboration, prevent data loss, and improve security.
A backend in Terraform determines how and where the state file is stored. It allows Terraform to:
Types of Terraform Backends
Terraform supports various backends, including:
With understanding of Terraform state files and backends, let's explore different strategies for managing state files across multiple environments.
Managing Terraform state files across multiple environments (e.g., development, staging, production) or multiple projects can be challenging. Below, we explore different approaches to handling Terraform state files in multi-environment deployments, along with their pros and cons.
In this approach, each environment has its own dedicated state file stored separately in a remote backend.
1a. Implementation with a single root module
Example project folder structure:
backend.tf
contains common backend configuration parameters, such as backend type.
It may look like this for a GCS backend:
Backend configuration files (*.config
) contain environment-specific parameters with the goal of separating
state files by specifying different buckets or prefixes. For example:
Before deploying an environment run terraform init -reconfigure
with a -backend-config
flag
identifying the proper backend config file:
Important:
terraform init
creates a local .terraform/terraform.tfstate
file containing the most recent
backend configuration. This file is different and entirely separate from the remote backend
terraform.tfstate
file that contains state data about your infrastructure. Terraform relies on the
backend configuration data from the local .terraform/terraform.tfstate
file for all subsequent
terraform init
and terraform apply
commands. Therefore, it is critical to explicitly initiate
the proper backend when switching between environments.
Pros
Cons
1b. Implementation with a separate root module per environment
Example project folder structure:
Each environment folder contains a dedicated backend configuration file.
For example, backend.tf
for the dev environment may look like this:
To deploy, navigate to the respective folder and run terraform
commands:
Pros
Cons
Terraform workspaces simplify state file management and allow multiple states to be stored within the same backend.
Implementation with a single root module
Example project folder structure:
A single backend.tf
file defines common GCS backend configuration for all environments:
Terraform stores all state files in the same GCS bucket and assigns file names using the following pattern:
<prefix>/<workspace_name>.tfstate
.
Use terraform workspace
commands to switch between environments:
Pros
Cons
In this configuration a single state file stores information for all environments.
Implementation
Example project folder structure:
Example Google Cloud Storage (GCS) backend configuration:
Pros
Cons
This approach is not recommended for larger projects because it lacks strict environment isolation.
Selecting the optimal Terraform project structure and state management strategy depends on many factors, including team size and experience, infrastructure complexity, CI/CD integration, security requirements, etc. There is no single right approach. You will need to take into account your particular situation, complete your own assessment, or just try a couple of different options.
That said, for most teams, the solution with a separate root module and a separate state file per environment (Option 1b) provides the best balance between security, scalability, and maintainability. On the other hand, Terraform workspaces (Option 2) can be a good starting point for smaller teams or less complex environments.
terraform/state/dev/terraform.tfstate
).By following the Terraform state management best practices and choosing the right project structure that based on team needs and infrastructure complexity, organizations can ensure a secure, efficient, and scalable cloud infrastructure deployments.
See Also:
Understanding Terraform Variable Precedence
Terraform Value Types Tutorial
Terraform count
Explained with Practical Examples
Terraform for_each
Tutorial with Practical Examples
Exploring Terraform dynamic
Blocks with GCP Examples
Working with External Data in Terraform
Handling Sensitive and Ephemeral Data in Terraform
Terraform Modules FAQ